A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst possible neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal website inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide awareness subsequent an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to construct their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced from the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-superior h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of severe climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and problems attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply just wanting to develop a family members household in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Location of Conservation and René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, don't change the underlying facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to establish whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.